From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/11827 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Waldemar Brodkorb Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Re: bbox: musl versus uclibc Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 06:29:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20170817042916.GR28021@waldemar-brodkorb.de> References: <20170816143428.5845c87c@windsurf> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1502944174 14733 195.159.176.226 (17 Aug 2017 04:29:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 04:29:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-11840-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Aug 17 06:29:30 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1diCQx-0003SU-1X for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 06:29:27 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 7666 invoked by uid 550); 17 Aug 2017 04:29:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 7642 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2017 04:29:28 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:11827 Archived-At: Hi, Jorge Almeida wrote, > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Thomas Petazzoni > wrote: > > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:59:41 -0500, wdlkmpx wrote: > > > > >> The project has been badly managed.. thats the only reason i can think > > > > uClibc-ng is alive at https://uclibc-ng.org/. Regular releases > > (actually more regular than musl in recent months!), updated web site, > > responsive maintainer, lots of cleanup in the code base, and QA effort. > > > > I just visited the link you provided. I was curious to know whether to > compile a program one still has to "make menuconfig", which IMO is > fine for the linux kernel. So I clicked the "Documentation" link. It > leads to an "Overview over different language related features". > > What did I do wrong? Nothing. I updated the page now. A valid config is still required to build a uClibc-ng toolchain. You can avoid this by just using Buildroot, Crosstool-ng or OpenADK, which all have good uClibc-ng toolchain support. best regards Waldemar