From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/12073 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Szabolcs Nagy Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Add SOCK_STREAM support for syslog Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:07:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20171110140749.GC15263@port70.net> References: <1510319851.23177.3.camel@mittwald.de> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510322890 13915 195.159.176.226 (10 Nov 2017 14:08:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:08:10 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-12089-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Nov 10 15:08:02 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eD9yP-00036c-Qc for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:07:57 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 7237 invoked by uid 550); 10 Nov 2017 14:08:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 7183 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2017 14:08:01 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1510319851.23177.3.camel@mittwald.de> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:12073 Archived-At: * Jan Horstmann [2017-11-10 13:17:31 +0000]: > some time ago there was a discussion whether musl-libc's syslog should > support SOCK_STREAM as a fall back if SOCK_DGRAM fails like glibc does > ( http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2015/08/10/1 ) > Later on a patch was posted to the mailing list: http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2017/08/21/3 > Since we depend on this functionality we have applied this patch and are quiet happy with it. > I would like to know whether there are any plans to incorporate this patch into a future release? i think you need to explain why you depend on this to get consensus on the inclusion of the patch. > Kind regards, > Jan