From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/12648 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Markus Wichmann Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Maybe not a bug but a possible omission? Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:53:34 +0200 Message-ID: <20180329045334.GA16743@voyager> References: <20180328171948.GC4418@port70.net> <20180328175425.GN1436@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522299111 25149 195.159.176.226 (29 Mar 2018 04:51:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 04:51:51 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-12662-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Mar 29 06:51:47 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f1PXN-0006R8-Qm for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:51:45 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 30251 invoked by uid 550); 29 Mar 2018 04:53:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 30228 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2018 04:53:48 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:j7JAQGrKhHKh0zik3qinBZRF9mY3F0r5RuV5VnjwWVDWXXJR0SY lSiMOEjQQef/S7FAMW7vnyLmfqEz7kkayrUodhzpHjJrIYbzeov3vmkZ9ATdMWIstpyFDaK wGmbEIi1FO1Ik4Ql8DlC+CzWk1ZlsAmL3NP0c5qY89UCZRjbJ6AGHfqKjumxLSFB0rbagKR VDby0oWt+8fmuJdrDCuVQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:2hDtmRjWmE0=:GA73oolfhudEwWijWZ+zxs QXVc7uw5XbAK5k5YiKVTqcZ/XaT6bgMRDwbGxrnih4VvnXGYMRvlJhla/qxyoECSpj1tBigHH Cfb8x29mMO0mfic4gbbSGHwS8y8lyZ/laINhEreU7X3VxwPH5dLCa2Z/IqwLfcdkjfw9I0YOC PdPZ9c7sDi25guvI6MhK6Yq0PguWsZ4TKbD/cQIomp4jRLe6im/MBUusvO8XZzrdbrPT7QRIu IV5yVMOPa0z1dfl1u8jzJoHmqBBeZxu7KIoVQ48nDtSndAAv4lDxAd8gGfoEePRIoFo+qbRXN r4sLoVOiEmTNkcKiO8Oomz9djEVvpoWay50UFtMsg78MVrwLZH6ABA+UBn3xyjNWG3N4hVYj8 X4stK2VbdBO8mWhHhxaDFpjl8Xn4SZK2PFUrkP9XhjF+3Dzg9VvpHyAyXt3JhvzcyLFQ47RoB TZYaBk10dIv+3HvoYsxOqcSdoKvklVOY1oUf4ro+2CNtelTj/8evVdjes91KWzxCbaoKFO7AG egmpd26YGTAC655ockPFDUBoxNcFlpgNTKIAjjITOKBMdKxBEBe1h8lcsZVAQvpvSKoNHr+CY Acy8ykXlLodfrnq5P8oAVy+qbD5+ZW0+eXFL813SiaL/D5rlubuiQ9cfk7WuIpCnE3/ztWNbq NP8qbVNf4sl24kBYnmaW7Y5inNPk+lG4NMTcSydBiekbQrnWYjxslZhh8xlH4mmRJjXEQrj8F MKPtmbCT/FZUzqbSDyy5tMpNPGY+H2SHi8VXD30xbPRX9u4LEnUy1mGSet7tY8dL61KPwEHU Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:12648 Archived-At: On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:30:52AM +0000, Jon Scobie wrote: > Intended types? It's a macro. Where is the type definition? It is inferred. Inferred by a standardised algorithm. So where's the problem? > Why not just make it implicit when the language allows for it? > But... the type _is_ implicit here. Also, Rich explained why. Do not attempt to fix swig by changing musl. The type inferrence rules haven't changed since 1989, except to add long long int to the list. Also, please add your answers at the bottom on this list. > ---- > The information contained in this communication is private and confidential > and may contain privileged material. It is intended solely for use by the > recipient(s). Well then you probably should not have sent it to a mailing list with an online archive. > Copying, distributing, disclosing or using any of the > information in it or any attachments is strictly prohibited and may be > unlawful. In that generality, that is only true in the US. However, this list is international. Ciao, Markus