From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Possible issue around utime() and symlinks on at least MIPS64
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 18:37:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180418223713.GK3094@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89968ffc-d4ae-93d1-0810-345ad03f2a53@adelielinux.org>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:51:31PM -0500, A. Wilcox wrote:
> On 04/18/18 15:00, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 02:50:16PM +0100, Adam Hill wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Not carried out ANY investigation around this... unfortunately I
> >> don't have any time atm. Could also have been mentioned already or
> >> actually be a bug in tar itself etc. but I couldn't find anything
> >> with my quick search. Just thought I'd mention it in case anyone
> >> does feel inclined to investigate.
> >>
> >> I compiled OpenWrt using pretty much default build settings for an
> >> octeon chip... it uses musl-1.1.16. The only real change I made was
> >> to use GNU tar rather than busybox. The resulting tar binary can't
> >> fix the modification/access times on any extracted symbolic links,
> >> resulting in for example:
> >>
> >> tar: usr/share/zoneinfo/Africa: Cannot utime: Invalid argument
> >>
> >> I didn't have strace available so can't even be sure tar's using
> >> utime()... just going by the error message alone.
> >>
> >> I recompiled OpenWrt changing only the C library ( to GCC ) and the
> >> resulting tar binary worked fine... so I can only *assume* it's
> >> something to do with musl.
> >
> > Did anyone ever get a chance to look further into this? It's been on
> > my todo for a long time, but without sufficient information to
> > reproduce I don't know where to begin. I spent about 20 minutes
> > looking at the musl and kernel code now and it does not seem likely
> > that this is mips64-specific.
> >
> > Rich
> >
>
> This really sounds like broken cross-compiling. When we cross-compile
> cp, it's unable to handle xattrs until it's re-compiled on native
> hardware. I'd suggest poking around at autoconf for GNU tar and seeing
> what it is 'guessing' the environment is like, and perhaps overriding
> some with ac_*={yes,no} on the configure line.
That's a good thought and would probably explain why we haven't hit a
similar issue elsewhere. It probably also indicates a bug in
gnulib/tar rather than musl.
Rich
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-18 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-06 13:50 Adam Hill
2018-04-18 20:00 ` Rich Felker
2018-04-18 21:51 ` A. Wilcox
2018-04-18 22:37 ` Rich Felker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180418223713.GK3094@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
--to=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).