From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/13664 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Szabolcs Nagy Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Symbol versioning approximation trips on compat symbols Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:33:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20190128113314.GA21289@port70.net> References: <87r2d5evvi.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20190124014340.GV23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20190124110931.GU21289@port70.net> <87sgxi718r.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20190127040424.GA23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20190127093650.GB30123@example.net> <87bm41xpce.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20190128111732.26097820@vostro> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="127365"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: Florian Weimer , u-uy74@aetey.se To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-13680-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Jan 28 12:33:29 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1go5AO-000WzH-Nx for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:33:28 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 30177 invoked by uid 550); 28 Jan 2019 11:33:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 30159 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2019 11:33:26 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: musl@lists.openwall.com, Florian Weimer , u-uy74@aetey.se Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190128111732.26097820@vostro> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:13664 Archived-At: * Timo Teras [2019-01-28 11:17:32 +0200]: > > Has anyone built toolchain with symbol versions disabled from recent > binutils+gcc and used that to build a non-trivial amount of software? > Say 100+ packages? i tried to build at least gcc out of curiosity, the build succeeds, but libgcc_s.so.1 have symvers anyway (other target libs like libstdc++.so.6 are fine).