On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:57:54 -0600
"A. Wilcox" <awilfox@adelielinux.org> wrote:

> On 01/28/19 00:34, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > As I explained, precisely that is not the case because the main musl
> > user, Alpine Linux, builds musl with a broken toolchain that is not
> > properly targeted to musl's features.  I think the official musl
> > instructions have the same result.  
> 
> 
> *ahem* Adélie?  OpenWrt?  Void?  midipix?  morpheus?  Emscripten?
> 
> Alpine hardly has a monopoly on usage of musl.
> 
> Of course, since almost all of us follow the patches and configuration
> of m-c-m, that's a moot point.  But the idea that "musl == Alpine" is
> a harmful one, especially as the community continues to grow.
> 

It should be nice if musl.cc (if this is community-musl page) could
list all the distributions based on Musl (including Dragora,
Sabotage, ...) and all the cross-compiler projects, etc.  :-)