From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: atanhf(x) Slight Accuracy Improvements
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:07:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190317230729.GQ26605@port70.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1903172219370.6962@key0.esi.com.au>
* Damian McGuckin <damianm@esi.com.au> [2019-03-17 22:41:53 +1100]:
> ATANH(x) From .. To WORST ERROR % ERROR>EPS/2 MEAN ERROR
>
> Improved:0.00000..0.00012 0.04027*EPS 0.00000% 0.00301*EPS
> Original:0.00000..0.00012 0.99741*EPS 0.39818% 0.00581*EPS
>
> Improved:0.00012..0.00100 0.66667*EPS 8.86075% 0.21559*EPS
> Original:0.00012..0.00100 0.95814*EPS 7.42942% 0.21211*EPS
>
> Improved:0.00100..0.17157 0.55526*EPS 0.00605% 0.17453*EPS
> Original:0.00100..0.17157 1.09363*EPS 8.51956% 0.23306*EPS
>
> Improved:0.17157..0.18248 0.63539*EPS 0.41833% 0.18648*EPS
> Original:0.17157..0.18248 1.07990*EPS 5.23646% 0.21706*EPS
>
> Improved:0.18248..0.26667 0.83800*EPS 2.10627% 0.18376*EPS
> Original:0.18248..0.26667 1.12385*EPS 8.71681% 0.23764*EPS
>
> Improved:0.26667..0.55000 0.90005*EPS 3.97403% 0.20866*EPS
> Original:0.26667..0.55000 1.12779*EPS 9.27245% 0.24201*EPS
>
> Improved:0.55000..1.00000 0.68372*EPS 1.39651% 0.19197*EPS
> Original:0.55000..1.00000 0.68372*EPS 1.40897% 0.19207*EPS
>
> Does this sort of gain make it worthwhile pursing a double version?
if you improve accuracy without performance loss that sounds
useful, but i cannot comment on it without seeing the patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-17 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-13 11:18 Damian McGuckin
2019-03-15 1:24 ` Damian McGuckin
2019-03-17 11:41 ` Damian McGuckin
2019-03-17 23:07 ` Szabolcs Nagy [this message]
2019-03-17 23:46 ` Damian McGuckin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190317230729.GQ26605@port70.net \
--to=nsz@port70.net \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).