From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/14078
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Sami Farin <hvtaifwkbgefbaei@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: musl-1.1.22 -static segfaults in __init_tls
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:10:00 +0200
Message-ID: <20190415151000.fe2r37xpcqx6omcu@m.mifar.in>
References: <20190415105917.3zwos4rdvipm6ypa@m.mifar.in>
 <20190415130737.GF26605@port70.net>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="96872"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4+1 (667a9b3) (2019-03-13)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-14094-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Apr 15 17:22:06 2019
Return-path: <musl-return-14094-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-14094-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1hG3Qq-000P1Y-Tj
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:22:05 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 26416 invoked by uid 550); 15 Apr 2019 15:22:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 11986 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2019 15:10:12 -0000
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mifar.in AF0855FC0D
Mail-Followup-To: Sami Farin <hvtaifwkbgefbaei@gmail.com>,
	musl@lists.openwall.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190415130737.GF26605@port70.net>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:14078
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/14078>

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 15:07:37 +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Sami Farin <hvtaifwkbgefbaei@gmail.com> [2019-04-15 12:59:17 +0200]:
> > Fedora 29 Linux, gcc-8.3.1-2.fc29, x86_64 kernel 4.19.33.
> > 
> > $ cat musl_crash.c; musl-gcc musl_crash.c -static; ./a.out
> > int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
> >     return 0;
> > }
> > 
> > Segmentation fault
> 
> this is likely a broken binutils
> 
> if the ldflag
> 
>   -Wl,--build-id
> 
> or
> 
>   -Wl,-z,noseparate-code
> 
> fixes it then it's
> 
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428
> 
> report it to fedora as it affects anything static linked.
> (even with glibc if all non-executable load sections are
> turned off such as the note section for build-id)

Thanks.  Both of those options you suggested generated a non-segfaulting
binary with buggy Fedora binutils.  

I applied these commits and musl-gcc generates working binaries (without
needing to pass those ldflags):
6737a6b34f4823deb7142f27b4074831a37ac1e1
d55c3e36094f06bb1fb02f5eac19fdccf1d91f7e
28a27bdbb9500797e6767f80c8128b09112aeed5
d97f1f87b31901ccdb711ec88a0ab792c31d1f60

But I'll just wait till binutils-2.31.2 is released later this year,
Fedora probably doesn't bother cherry-picking...

Make check produces now
# of expected passes		2257
# of unexpected failures	28
# of expected failures		57
# of untested testcases		6
# of unsupported tests		16

which I hope is better than Fedora 29 2.31.1-25:
# of unexpected failures	39

--