From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/14514 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fix risc64 user_regs_struct conflict with kernel header Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 10:04:28 -0400 Message-ID: <20190806140428.GV9017@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <63f4c551e85a848e336f41539b6dd283396eeda7.1565070674.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> <20190806121047.GT9017@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <87imra7amk.fsf@tarshish> <20190806130129.GU9017@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20190806131603.GE22009@port70.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="239871"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-14530-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Aug 06 16:04:44 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hv04x-0010HL-PK for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 16:04:43 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 7824 invoked by uid 550); 6 Aug 2019 14:04:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 7805 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2019 14:04:40 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190806131603.GE22009@port70.net> Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:14514 Archived-At: On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:16:03PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Rich Felker [2019-08-06 09:01:29 -0400]: > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:15:47PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 06 2019, Rich Felker wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 08:51:14AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > > > >> -struct user_regs_struct { > > > >> +struct _user_regs_struct { > > > > > > > > Does this agree with glibc naming? > > > > > > glibc riscv headers do not define user_regs_struct. > > > > Not even by including a kernel header that defines it? If so, then the > > the glibc sys/user.h is empty on riscv. > > user_regs_struct is declared in asm/ptrace.h in linux > but that's not included into libc headers on riscv. > > i think musl's user.h should be empty too. Good news for once! That's even better. Rich