From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/14553 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Re: size of executable Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 13:18:51 -0400 Message-ID: <20190812171851.GS9017@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="248238"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-14569-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Aug 12 19:19:08 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hxDyM-0012Qp-5Q for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 19:19:06 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 14075 invoked by uid 550); 12 Aug 2019 17:19:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 14055 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2019 17:19:03 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:14553 Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 05:55:28PM +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:48 PM Jorge Almeida wrote: > > > > > with gcc-8.3.0 on x86_64. Could someone check the following hello.c > > and see what size you get? > > I get 16768 bytes (not stripped) and 12324 (stripped). > > Note that I'm not even using printf. > > > > Thanks > > > > #include > > int main(int argc, char* argv[]){ > > write(1, "Hello, bloated world...\n", 24); > > } > > Sorry, I forgot to add the compile options. In attachement, due to > Gmail interface being what it is. > gcc -static -Os -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -Wall -Werror=pedantic -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -pedantic -pedantic-errors -mpreferred-stack-boundary=4 -falign-functions=1 -falign-jumps=1 -falign-loops=1 -fno-unwind-tables -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -Wl,--gc-sections -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fstrict-aliasing -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Wno-unused-function -std=c11 hello.c > > Stripping: > > strip -s a.out > strip -S --strip-unneeded --remove-section=.note.gnu.gold-version --remove-section=.comment --remove-section=.note --remove-section=.note.gnu.build-id --remove-section=.note.ABI-tag --remove-section=.eh_frame --remove-section=.eh_frame_ptr -R .note -R .comment -R .note.GNU-stack a.out > sstrip a.out This is a binutils regression from a dubious anti-ROP feature, -z separate-code. Add -Wl,-z,noseparate-code and it will go away. FYI musl-cross-make has been updated to change the default back in toolchains it builds. Rich