From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/14654 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: ARM Cortex-M FDPIC ABI Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:19:44 -0400 Message-ID: <20190911141944.GW9017@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="75053"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-14670-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Sep 11 16:19:58 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i83TS-000JP6-F1 for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 16:19:58 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 28428 invoked by uid 550); 11 Sep 2019 14:19:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 28410 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2019 14:19:55 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:14654 Archived-At: On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 05:08:57PM +0300, Alexandru Onea wrote: > Dear musl developers, > > I am reading in the roadmap [1] that musl 1.1.26 introduces the ARM FDPIC > ABI, which is great news. Is there a development branch / snapshot > including this feature, which I can use for experimental work? > > [1] https://wiki.musl-libc.org/roadmap.html#musl-1.1.26 Roadmap is intent for future development, not secret branches that are already finished. :-) (Well, the switchover to time64 is kinda such a branch, but the patches have been posted on the list.) Anyway, now that the FDPIC ABI is upstream in GCC, it can definitely happen. To make it easy to go forward, I need to get a version of GCC that ARM FDPIC patches will apply to supported in musl-cross-make. After that it shouldn't be hard to make it work. Rich