From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/14818 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Szabolcs Nagy Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Testing of musl Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:09:34 +0200 Message-ID: <20191016130934.GK7832@port70.net> References: <20191016114449.GT16318@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="23553"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-14834-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Oct 16 15:09:50 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iKj3l-00060n-2h for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:09:49 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 18178 invoked by uid 550); 16 Oct 2019 13:09:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 18157 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2019 13:09:46 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191016114449.GT16318@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:14818 Archived-At: * Rich Felker [2019-10-16 07:44:49 -0400]: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 09:17:24AM +0200, Miroslav Chabrecek wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > I tried to run libc-tests (http://nsz.repo.hu/git/?p=libc-test;a=summary) > > on x86_64 architecture with musl library. > > In results, there are many FAILED tests: > > ~5 Compilation API errors > > ~5. Runtime errors > > ~ 182 Math precision errors you should grep out the lines starting with X from the math errors those are expected and harmless. (most of the other math errors are also expected, but i havent filtered them out yet for various reasons) > malloc-brk-fail and possibly a few other similar tests fail on some > systems but do not indicate a bug in musl; rather they indicate that > the test has some issues with how it evaluates what it's trying to > measure. i'd say it's a linux kernel bug. but since it's unlikely to be fixed i might need to find another way to test out-of-memory conditions.