From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/14819
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: loff_t definition in <fcntl.h> (vs. glibc in <sys/types.h>)
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 23:28:38 +0200
Message-ID: <20191016212835.GA17420@dell5510>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="75249"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com
To: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Original-X-From: musl-return-14835-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Oct 16 23:28:57 2019
Return-path: <musl-return-14835-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-14835-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1iKqqn-000JSo-2A
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 23:28:57 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 5337 invoked by uid 550); 16 Oct 2019 21:28:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 5305 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2019 21:28:52 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:mime-version
         :content-disposition:user-agent;
        bh=Q4S6hLhoAgtd5Utae72ZTXcDnefEVF5oNDsEBCq2WiY=;
        b=kHg8zvYTNZr8EW9mhxx0n6PjxCILuR41w6UXtD0/yarhZUehRR963NQ9UI3bvLTrqc
         R2S3qepID5opiRQJKiZDmwxBVsIQPffaS9y0LrHrKiyxjqn23U3T3H4h0h2s/9SJDtqF
         +PE1MyvL5HyK6vwnZBW4IFA4ws11Rzir5/LN6xpW2oJPVJTWZt6fa09NX+AHBe2X9tVV
         c7RRkt+2qCZ6PgdIiLOlQmpJPDg2CPOFyul/n7QyTV2Mc/6iBeafqlHe4u54hw8UYeY0
         r80hqxmuyVhfsvNrw7j+/ZnSbz28SBcnE5wOOmX1TiU5+X2XIN0anP3Kn/Qxr0PycYoq
         mF4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to
         :mime-version:content-disposition:user-agent;
        bh=Q4S6hLhoAgtd5Utae72ZTXcDnefEVF5oNDsEBCq2WiY=;
        b=hduW4L73l1fZDdqmRm27+xP+EdWs65r97OMY0VDTLxR9Z7wb4iQMIXBRM+5LvY2/p1
         20xznTlEhiuVQHRKdiDrDsTUHBvgHoDHLsLRS2/SnH66RswrOhf+WBg4gKhYLRfPY7/i
         QOIV19BalQTSZ5NnDDf1+JhRJMAJOSKZz5BlH4+mF8MjTUvTUd2ay6kZkbbgqOu+udqp
         Fr9pbp7bPIEZ5Kd2rTdaxBztrhgGts0zuLnL89ZJhCIxwqzi404dOO/JwqPfxRY7EUW3
         5ujJuyIlHt2a3pBgR1MGYQnzj1tmtrMZrp+ORC9F0nfF/M1l3YeeicaaxEHsu9/Xb52R
         vVfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUhkeXYVkL3HrrFSr6ZBE9e1Z8tAXXotpg/XKGWMdlR1ArCjvNE
	hU1y2Du4CU6uMTlbmqiZaZpqsMZqf4U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw7z8vgKj8VoC0afVM8JKRZ9oYh/48D+W27oNfTzpWVFXQYnGpTFAUcDUkJROU1+jItkxbcZw==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1bd8:: with SMTP id b207mr5061480wmb.62.1571261320798;
        Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:14819
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/14819>

Hi Rich,

what is the reason for loff_t being defined in <fcntl.h> ?
It was defined some time ago, in v0.9.5.

glibc (and thus uclibc; + also Bionic) has it in <sys/types.h>, defined long
time before.  Who is correct? I guess loff_t not being posix, therefore it
shouldn't be in <sys/types.h> ?

I'm asking because it'd be nice to have it for both in single header
(portability).

Kind regards,
Petr