From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <musl-return-15358-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@lists.openwall.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with SMTP id 9a5afae5
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Mon, 3 Feb 2020 02:10:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 27804 invoked by uid 550); 3 Feb 2020 02:10:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 27781 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2020 02:09:59 -0000
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 21:09:45 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Message-ID: <20200203020945.GK1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
References: <20200118094015.GE23985@port70.net>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.2001240755500.28245@key0.esi.com.au>
 <20200124011122.GP30412@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.2001241227030.6298@key0.esi.com.au>
 <20200124045554.GR30412@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.2001241604050.13947@key0.esi.com.au>
 <20200124134402.GS30412@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.2001251055530.14796@key0.esi.com.au>
 <20200125001100.GY30412@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.2002031144370.25330@key0.esi.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.2002031144370.25330@key0.esi.com.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Subject: Re: [musl] Considering x86-64 fenv.s to C

On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 11:54:52AM +1100, Damian McGuckin wrote:
> 
> Latest Implementation Document is attached.
> 
> Comments need reviewing and clarification.
> 
> Style issues will need to be addressed.
> 
> This is meant for for ARM with hardware floating point, any MIPS,
> RISC-V, M68K, Hitachi SuperH, IBM S390x, Powerpc64, and (in theory)
> Sparc.
> 
> The version to handle Intel i386, x32 and x86-64 will be very different.

Hi. Just checking in to let you know I'm not ignoring you, but might
need a bit to task-switch back to following up on this. I'll try to do
it in parallel with finishing up the release cycle.

Rich