From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [musl] Q: dealing with missing removal of excess precision
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:46:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200206174608.GG1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.20.13.2002061943170.17652@monopod.intra.ispras.ru>
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:15:30PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2020, Rich Felker wrote:
>
> > I think I might like to go ahead and apply these patches now, or at
> > least some of them -- the ones fixing excess precision -- rather
> > waiting, because I got a report of a nasty bug stemming from excess
> > precision of the inverse trig functions:
>
> That might be exactly the empty set of patches, as I did not yet post
> any for functions that might return with excess precision.
Indeed, I just discovered that...
> Be advised that I found bugs in my patches, so given that no one so far
> has pointed them out on the mailing list indicates that either nobody
> bothered to review, or people are keeping the findings to themselves.
I think it's just that I was planning to do further review after
release rather than before since I'm trying to get the release out..
> > If writing and testing the remaining i386 functions before release is
> > not practical, I wonder if just removing the asm for now, and adding
> > back the new code in next release cycle would be a good idea. Or I
> > could just leave it, but I don't like making a release with "known
> > bugs of consequence" like this.
>
> I think fixing excess precision in inverse trig functions might be
> easier than removing the asm entirely.
Yes, what I'm looking at right now is fixing inverse trig and log
functions and removing the exp asm (since the exp logic is way too
messy for me to feel comfortable modifying right now) and possibly
re-adding it later as inline asm with the flow control in C.
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-06 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-05 16:35 math patches for moving bare asm to C inline asm Alexander Monakov
2020-01-05 16:36 ` [PATCH] math: move x86_64 fabs, fabsf to C with " Alexander Monakov
2020-01-05 20:05 ` Rich Felker
2020-01-05 21:32 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-01-05 22:43 ` Rich Felker
2020-01-06 8:17 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-01-06 8:40 ` [PATCH] math: move more x86-family fabs functions to C Alexander Monakov
2020-03-21 17:06 ` [musl] " Rich Felker
2020-01-06 16:50 ` [PATCH] math: move trivial x86-family sqrt " Alexander Monakov
2020-01-06 17:43 ` [PATCH] math: move i386 sqrtf " Alexander Monakov
2020-01-06 18:32 ` Pascal Cuoq
2020-01-09 15:55 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-01-09 17:00 ` Rich Felker
2020-01-09 21:00 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-01-09 22:00 ` Rich Felker
2020-01-09 23:18 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-01-10 2:07 ` Rich Felker
2020-01-10 9:17 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-01-14 17:59 ` [musl] " Alexander Monakov
2020-01-14 18:47 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-01-07 13:06 ` [PATCH] math: move i386 sqrt " Alexander Monakov
2020-01-08 7:26 ` Rich Felker
2020-03-21 17:53 ` [musl] " Rich Felker
2020-03-21 17:57 ` Rich Felker
2020-03-21 20:30 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH] math: move x86_64 (l)lrint(f) functions " Alexander Monakov
2020-01-11 15:23 ` [PATCH] math: move more x86-family lrint " Alexander Monakov
2020-01-11 16:07 ` Rich Felker
2020-01-11 16:22 ` Rich Felker
2020-01-14 11:54 ` [musl] [PATCH] math: move x86-family rint " Alexander Monakov
2020-01-14 18:17 ` [musl] Q: dealing with missing removal of excess precision Alexander Monakov
2020-01-14 18:50 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-01-14 18:58 ` Rich Felker
2020-01-14 19:53 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-02-06 14:51 ` Rich Felker
2020-02-06 17:15 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-02-06 17:46 ` Rich Felker [this message]
2020-02-06 19:03 ` Rich Felker
2020-02-06 20:02 ` Rich Felker
2020-02-06 22:08 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-02-22 19:59 ` Rich Felker
2020-02-22 20:21 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-02-23 0:19 ` Rich Felker
2020-02-23 16:14 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-03-20 18:12 ` Rich Felker
2020-03-22 1:19 ` Rich Felker
2020-03-22 17:40 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-03-22 17:53 ` Rich Felker
2020-03-22 18:51 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-03-22 19:10 ` Rich Felker
2020-03-22 19:46 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-01-14 20:41 ` [musl] [PATCH] math: move x86-family remainder functions to C Alexander Monakov
2020-01-15 6:54 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-01-15 15:44 ` [musl] [PATCH] math: move x86-family fmod " Alexander Monakov
2020-01-16 21:00 ` [musl] [PATCH] math: add x86_64 remquol Alexander Monakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200206174608.GG1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
--to=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).