mailing list of musl libc
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [musl] No such process return value in pthread_getcpuclockid
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 15:14:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200210201448.GS1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14a8dbf3-1382-e61c-3b4e-3a3174dd75b2@bell-sw.com>

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:57:22PM +0300, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
> On 10.02.2020 22:34, Rich Felker wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:29:02PM +0300, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>It seems that pthread_getcpuclockid does not properly handle non
> >>valid thread id argument.
> >>
> >>Below is a sample which calls pthread_getcpuclockid with NULL thread
> >>id. The expected result is ESRCH (No thread with the ID thread could
> >>be found). It crashes in my docker with Alpine Linux 3.11.3 (musl
> >>libc x86_64 1.1.24). It returns ESRCH on my Ubuntu system.
> >There's no such thing as a "null thread id". A pthread_t value is
> >either the id of a thread which is still valid (still running or
> >joinable and not yet joined), or *any* use of it produces undefined
> >behavior. There is no value reserved for a sentinel. If you need an
> >optional thread id variable/field, you need a separate validity flag
> >alongside it.
> >
> >None of this is unique to musl; it's the way the POSIX threads
> >interfaces are designed.
> 
> I can create a thread, join to it and use the thread id in
> pthread_getcpuclockid function after that.

That has undefined behavior, and the fact that it does is *inherent* -
reusable resource identifiers can be reused as soon as they're freed
(and nonreusable ones only admit a finite number of resource ever to
exist). Expecting use of pthread_t after its lifetime to give a
meaningful error is analogous to expecting free() or close() to give
you a meaningful error.

If you need a citation, it's XSH 2.9.2 Thread IDs:

    "Although implementations may have thread IDs that are unique in a
    system, applications should only assume that thread IDs are usable
    and unique within a single process. The effect of calling any of
    the functions defined in this volume of POSIX.1-2017 and passing
    as an argument the thread ID of a thread from another process is
    unspecified. The lifetime of a thread ID ends after the thread
    terminates if it was created with the detachstate attribute set to
    PTHREAD_CREATE_DETACHED or if pthread_detach() or pthread_join()
    has been called for that thread. A conforming implementation is
    free to reuse a thread ID after its lifetime has ended. If an
                                                            ^^^^^
    application attempts to use a thread ID whose lifetime has ended,
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    the behavior is undefined."
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/V2_chap02.html#tag_15_09_02

> The Linux Programmer's Manual has the following errors section:
> "ESRCH  No thread with the ID thread could be found."
> 
> Does pthread_getcpuclockid function from musl follows the similar
> errors handling approach?

The specification of ESRCH for pthread interfaces was a bug, because a
"shall fail" or even "may fail" condition makes no sense with a
behavior that's explicitly undefined (in which case the implementation
is allowed to do anything at all). This was clarified in POSIX 2008 as
a result of Austin Group interpretation 142:

https://collaboration.opengroup.org/austin/interps/documents/14366/AI-142.txt

Unfortunately the Linux man pages have not corrected this.

Rich

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-10 20:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-10 19:29 Alexander Scherbatiy
2020-02-10 19:34 ` Rich Felker
2020-02-10 19:57   ` Alexander Scherbatiy
2020-02-10 20:14     ` Rich Felker [this message]
2020-02-11  9:16       ` Alexander Scherbatiy
2020-02-10 20:23     ` Markus Wichmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200210201448.GS1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
    --to=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).