From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with SMTP id e1c0be35 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 17:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3812 invoked by uid 550); 15 Feb 2020 17:45:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 3787 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2020 17:45:23 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 18:45:11 +0100 From: Milan =?utf-8?Q?P=2E_Stani=C4=87?= To: musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <20200215174511.GA30522@arya.arvanta.net> References: <20200215172923.GR1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200215172923.GR1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Subject: Re: [musl] Re: Musl gentoo development: browsers On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 12:29, Rich Felker wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 03:20:08PM +0100, Brian Peregrine wrote: > > I probably need to clarify the approach further. > > The idea is to have something (more precisely a script) which is > > intented specifically for gentoo (not all linux variants; not that the > > pull is to the gentoo/musl repo btw). Once that's ready, a binary can > > be made. Speaking for our own distro, it can be used on the optional > > usb stick (https://github.com/Sharrisii/TAZ_optional_usb_stick/tree/master/binaries > > ). I assume these binaries can then also be shared and used with > > non-gentoo based linux versions (if generic compiler flags are used, > > which is also the idea). > > > > Interested people can work on improving the files in the pull > > (https://github.com/gentoo/musl/pull/296 ) and then having these > > improvements added to the pull. > > > > Adelie's firefox-esr version is 68.5.0, jakeogh's version (in pull) is > > v.41 so Adelie's version is indeed newer. Current is v73, so still > > needs to be improved it further. So yes, you could already switch this > > in the pull. > > The binary I used of Adelie (v52.9.0-r4, back in June 2019) didn't > > work, and wasn't optimized for i686 cpu's (and also, Adelie linux is > > based on abuild system rather then gentoo's portage system), so I am > > somewhat cautious. That said, if the script is worked out further, > > there may be no issues. > > AIUI Adélie follows -esr for which 68 is latest; is that incorrect? > Alpine has 73 in the testing repo. Alpine have both -esr in community and latest release (73.0) in testing. Though doesn't work on all architectures. > Rich