From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [musl] [PATCH] add statx
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 10:29:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200217152909.GW1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k14lwpdb.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:10:40AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Rich Felker:
>
> >> That's why the kernel always uses unsigned long long for __u64, which
> >> seems a reasonable trade-off to me. It will make porting to 128-bit
> >> architectures difficult. But I think we should focus on the
> >> architectures we have today.
> >
> > I disagree strongly with the last sentence. Designing an *API* in a
> > way that's not compatible with anything but long long == 64-bit is bad
> > API design.
>
> We don't know what LL128 architectures will look like. For all we know,
> they might have more expressive type descriptors for variadic functions,
> so the whole issue of matching integer types with precise format
> specifiers becomes moot.
I don't follow. Mechanically the wrong format for long long vs
int64_t *already works*; the problem at hand is that per the
language, it's undefined, and rightly produces warnings. None of that
would go away if LL128 archs used a fancy variadic call mechanism.
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-17 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-19 12:12 Ben Noordhuis
2020-01-24 8:38 ` [musl] " Ben Noordhuis
2020-01-24 14:01 ` Rich Felker
2020-01-28 8:59 ` Ben Noordhuis
2020-01-28 13:39 ` Rich Felker
2020-01-24 14:00 ` [musl] " Rich Felker
2020-01-24 15:27 ` Florian Weimer
2020-01-24 15:54 ` Rich Felker
2020-01-24 16:12 ` Florian Weimer
2020-01-24 16:29 ` Rich Felker
2020-01-28 10:41 ` Florian Weimer
2020-01-28 13:18 ` Rich Felker
2020-02-17 9:10 ` Florian Weimer
2020-02-17 15:29 ` Rich Felker [this message]
2022-08-27 14:57 ` [musl] [PATCH 0/1] " Duncan Bellamy
2022-08-27 14:57 ` [musl] [PATCH 1/1] resubmitting old statx patch with changes Duncan Bellamy
2022-08-27 18:10 ` Rich Felker
2022-08-27 23:11 ` Dunk
2022-08-27 23:11 ` [musl] [PATCH 0/2] V2 Duncan Bellamy
2022-08-27 23:11 ` [musl] [PATCH 1/2] V2 resubmitting old statx patch with changes Duncan Bellamy
2022-08-29 13:50 ` [musl] " Dunk
2022-08-27 23:11 ` [musl] [PATCH 2/2] V2 src/stat/fstatat.c use new statx define Duncan Bellamy
2022-08-31 19:07 ` [musl] [PATCH 0/2] V3 Duncan Bellamy
2022-08-31 19:07 ` [musl] [PATCH 1/2] V3 resubmitting old statx patch with changes Duncan Bellamy
2024-02-24 16:56 ` Rich Felker
2024-04-24 19:30 ` Rich Felker
2024-04-24 23:55 ` lolzery wowzery
2024-04-25 3:21 ` Markus Wichmann
2024-04-25 12:25 ` Rich Felker
2024-04-28 2:29 ` lolzery wowzery
2024-04-28 16:13 ` Rich Felker
2024-05-06 14:57 ` Rich Felker
2024-04-27 16:40 ` Rich Felker
2022-08-31 19:07 ` [musl] [PATCH 2/2] V3 src/stat/fstatat.c use new statx define Duncan Bellamy
2024-02-24 16:57 ` Rich Felker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200217152909.GW1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
--to=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).