From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Will Springer <skirmisher@protonmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
eery@paperfox.es, daniel@octaforge.org, musl@lists.openwall.com,
binutils@sourceware.org, libc-dev@lists.llvm.org
Subject: [musl] Re: ppc64le and 32-bit LE userland compatibility
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 15:42:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200531204205.GI31009@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2956705.fEcJ0Lxnt5@sheen>
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 12:57:12AM +0000, Will Springer wrote:
> On Saturday, May 30, 2020 12:22:12 PM PDT Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > The original sysv PowerPC supplement
> > http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/elf/elfspec_ppc.pdf
> > supports LE as well, and most powerpcle ports use that. But, the
> > big-endian Linux ABI differs in quite a few places, and it of course
> > makes a lot better sense if powerpcle-linux follows that.
>
> Right, I should have clarified I was talking about Linux ABIs
> specifically.
That was the link you deleted.
> > What patches did you need? I regularly build >30 cross compilers (on
> > both BE and LE hosts; I haven't used 32-bit hosts for a long time, but
> > in the past those worked fine as well). I also cross-built
> > powerpcle-linux-gcc quite a few times (from powerpc64le, from powerpc64,
> > from various x86).
>
> There was just an assumption that LE == powerpc64le in libgo, spotted by
> q66 (daniel@ on the CC). I just pushed the patch to [1].
Please send GCC patches to gcc-patches@ ?
> > Almost no project that used 32-bit PowerPC in LE mode has sent patches
> > to the upstreams.
>
> Right, but I have heard concerns from at least one person familiar with
> the ppc kernel about breaking existing users of this arch-endianness
> combo, if any. It seems likely that none of those use upstream, though ^^;
So we don't care, because we *cannot* care.
> > A huge factor in having good GCC support for powerpcle-linux (or
> > anything else) is someone needs to regularly test it, and share test
> > results with us (via gcc-testresults@). Hint hint hint :-)
> >
> > That way we know it is in good shape, know when we are regressing it,
> > know there is interest in it.
>
> Once I have more of a bootstrapped userland than a barely-functional
> cross chroot, I'll get back to you on that :)
Cool! Looking forward to it.
Thanks,
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-31 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-29 19:03 [musl] " Will Springer
2020-05-29 19:24 ` Rich Felker
2020-05-30 22:56 ` Will Springer
2020-05-30 15:37 ` [musl] " Christophe Leroy
2020-05-30 22:17 ` Will Springer
2020-06-05 23:54 ` Will Springer
2020-06-12 5:13 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-05-30 19:22 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-05-31 0:57 ` Will Springer
2020-05-31 20:42 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2020-05-31 22:29 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-02 1:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-01 21:28 ` Joseph Myers
2020-06-01 21:36 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-01 23:26 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-01 23:45 ` Joseph Myers
2020-06-01 23:55 ` Joseph Myers
2020-06-02 0:13 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-02 0:11 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-02 13:40 ` Joseph Myers
2020-06-02 14:23 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-06-02 15:13 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-02 15:27 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-06-02 15:40 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-02 15:56 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-06-04 17:20 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-04 17:12 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-04 17:18 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-04 17:33 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-04 17:46 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-04 19:00 ` David Edelsohn
2020-06-04 19:37 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-04 20:39 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-04 21:10 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-04 21:43 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-04 22:08 ` Joseph Myers
2020-06-04 22:26 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-05 0:02 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-04 23:42 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-04 23:35 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-05 2:18 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-05 17:27 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-05 17:50 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-05 23:45 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-05 21:59 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-06 0:12 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-06 2:13 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-02 14:52 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-02 2:12 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-02 2:17 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-02 13:50 ` Joseph Myers
2020-06-02 17:47 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-02 1:58 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-02 2:09 ` Jeffrey Walton
2020-06-02 2:12 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-02 2:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-02 2:55 ` Daniel Kolesa
2020-06-02 1:42 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-06-02 2:03 ` Daniel Kolesa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200531204205.GI31009@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=daniel@octaforge.org \
--cc=eery@paperfox.es \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=libc-dev@lists.llvm.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=skirmisher@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).