From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 23551 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2020 21:51:31 -0000 Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 25 Jun 2020 21:51:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 24317 invoked by uid 550); 25 Jun 2020 21:51:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 24297 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2020 21:51:29 -0000 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:51:17 -0400 From: Rich Felker To: musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <20200625215117.GU6430@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20200624204243.GL6430@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20200625081504.GE2048759@port70.net> <20200625153936.GP6430@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20200625173125.GF2048759@port70.net> <20200625205024.GR6430@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [musl] Release prep for 1.2.1, and afterwards On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 02:43:42PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:50 PM Rich Felker wrote: > > > > As noted in the past I'd like to get rid of having high level flow > > logic in the arch asm and instead have the arch provide string asm > > fragments, if desired, to copy blocks, which could then be used in a > > shared C skeleton. However as you noted this has been a point of > > practical performance problem for a long time and I don't think it's > > fair to just keep putting it off for a better solution. > > I'd like to see the patches to enable asm memcpy for big endian ARM > merged. I may be the only user of musl on big endian ARM though (?) so > not sure how much wider interest there is. I'd forgotten I hadn't already merged it. However I was just rereading it and something looks amiss. Can you take a look again? Rich