From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 9439 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2021 23:30:27 -0000 Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 30 Jan 2021 23:30:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 9595 invoked by uid 550); 30 Jan 2021 23:30:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 9577 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2021 23:30:24 -0000 Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 18:30:12 -0500 From: Rich Felker To: Jiahao XU Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <20210130233012.GR23432@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20210130201227.GP23432@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [musl] =?utf-8?B?Q2Fu4oCZ?= =?utf-8?Q?t?= build musl with lto=thin On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:04:32PM +0000, Jiahao XU wrote: > > So something like (in config.mak): > > > > obj/ldso/dlstart.lo: CFLAGS_ALL += -fno-lto > > Thanks, with this I was able to build libc.so successfully with clang and created a 3.5 KB hello world program using clang and lld. > > However, I still wasn’t able to statically linked with libc. > > Once I added ‘-static’ to the compiler flags, the executable failed with ‘Segmentation fault (core dumped)’. It's libc.a, not libc.so, that will be involved in making a static-linked binary. It's hard to know what's going wrong without more information. Can you run under a debugger and provide a backtrace, disassembly, and register dump for where the crash occurs? Rich > ________________________________ > From: Rich Felker > Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 7:12:31 AM > To: Jiahao XU > Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com > Subject: Re: [musl] Can’t build musl with lto=thin > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:19:42PM +0000, Jiahao XU wrote: > > musl-1.2.2 compilation with clang-11 failed to build libc.so at the final linking stage: > > > > ld.lld: error: undefined hidden symbol: __dls2 > > >>> referenced by ld-temp.o > > >>> lto.tmp:(_dlstart_c) > > >>> did you mean: __dls3 > > >>> defined in: lto.tmp > > > > I am using CFLAGS=‘-march=native -mtune=native -Oz -flto > > -fmerge-all-constants -fomit-frame-pointer’ and LDFLAGS=‘-flto > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > The -fmerge-all-constants option gives non-conforming language > semantics and should not be used, but that's a separate issue. > > > -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,—plugin-opt=O3,-O3,—icf=safe’. > > > No configure option is supplied. > > Otherwise, it's a known issue that LTO misses references from asm > (both top-level and in functions). I think dlstart.lo and a few other > files should just be built with LTO disabled; any LTO-type > optimization in code that runs at this stage is inherently invalid, > anyway. So something like (in config.mak): > > obj/ldso/dlstart.lo: CFLAGS_ALL += -fno-lto > > Rich