From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: Dominic Chen <d.c.ddcc@gmail.com>
Cc: fweimer@redhat.com, musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [musl] Incorrect thread TID caching
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 15:11:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210217201156.GK11590@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e2e3693-b16a-d158-9617-99978a2b287f@gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 02:49:45PM -0500, Dominic Chen wrote:
> On 2/15/2021 11:56 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
> >Following up on this now, the code in _Fork is something I really
> >don't want to duplicate for clone() for risk of forgetting there's a
> >copy in the latter and letting it bitrot there. I'd rather refactor
> >things so the same logic can be shared...
>
> Thanks for the update. Can you use something like
> __attribute__((always_inline)) to just write the logic once but
> force it to be inlined into both library functions?
Whether it's inlined isn't really a big deal; this is not a hot path.
It's more just a matter of how it needs to be split up at the source
level, and it seems to be messy whichever way we choose.
Trying to avoid calling __clone doesn't seem like such a good idea,
since the child has to run on a new stack -- if we did avoid it we'd
need a new way to switch stacks. The generic __unmapself has a hack
to do this already that we could reuse without needing new
arch-specific glue though.
I'll keep trying things and see if I come up with something not too
unreasonable.
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-17 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-03 4:04 Dominic Chen
2021-02-03 7:16 ` Florian Weimer
2021-02-03 19:21 ` Rich Felker
2021-02-03 20:21 ` Dominic Chen
2021-02-03 21:01 ` Rich Felker
2021-02-03 22:30 ` Dominic Chen
2021-02-03 22:55 ` Rich Felker
2021-02-15 16:56 ` Rich Felker
2021-02-17 19:49 ` Dominic Chen
2021-02-17 20:11 ` Rich Felker [this message]
2021-02-17 21:07 ` Rich Felker
2021-03-12 21:14 ` Dominic Chen
2021-02-04 3:28 ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-02-04 4:22 ` Dominic Chen
2021-02-04 16:15 ` Rich Felker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210217201156.GK11590@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
--to=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=d.c.ddcc@gmail.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).