From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	MISSING_HEADERS,PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 17873 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2021 05:20:22 -0000
Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 28 Sep 2021 05:20:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 9239 invoked by uid 550); 28 Sep 2021 05:20:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 8188 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2021 05:20:19 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=fifth.space; h=date:from
	:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20190812; bh=f80rQo1J
	CZXFTwoCUd0zdidHDRo=; b=EBgSBfjhSxsMXNJX0lN4x+LEP9vMe7Xc571ROiAx
	1sJS/v43D55ZqOULnyobRIOEei63a/B/iSZ/B7x443nt232mTuGcS9cYtU87CJWZ
	d9CFhu2yY29wA8ux6bWX2J4ZhHreuYpo+OF2VUlLW+upgjpV3hPocbDQpLdEehkJ
	QpxppE497h+vVr8k6IKE4pBS5jaAXyuj+efZh1MGi7rluSraP/d3T4MQ+ZxBUmiq
	ZxKaz4fW+QZKEb+8Y9kyiq48jPz4xmOwmMDBRZiihRIHAfd1vYDzesnoADKJ3vXI
	Lyfhu/CwfCfYEnJEXqUpxusiJj0i3HGNhLIsCsL8f8w2Cg==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=fifth.space; h=date:from:cc
	:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20190812; b=QW
	64ieG7PvoYfkvgp+X0sQFxfU32srmgHbQLn1kjMfS8WFAyuHmzh1A5m5AJatrmls
	SjD1sUaGoEszyvsRhjmk05ehXFqxLek41Msl5cwCRwIieHKZKO1t1ckoNAilquSG
	my0mKLvczUWF+VZhM4TiDdh4q4moG8OpxAvFWW1km/X8/pS7bhEcGBpJ/7fh2Knu
	oRtYhfKJt0Ggu0nAidKQhPa1HC6FbmUvVgxp5pvO/zaGI0j9kh7jVCC0prwJVN4P
	P7+ZJgpOCs6zrKZyhakQ2oUEvPRDDesg9LjdLf9AtP77CzkWwfm+h7fJPqtNq1de
	mswnWmHn+/n2TT63nhgw==
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 07:20:05 +0200
From: Quentin Rameau <quinq@fifth.space>
Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com
Message-ID: <20210928072005.477eea59@tpx.quinq.eu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210927233515.GA4428@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
References: <20210927233515.GA4428@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [musl] Promoting extension functions up from _GNU_SOURCE ?

Hi Rich,

> For the ones that are POSIX-future, we could go ahead and move them to
> baseline _POSIX_C_SOURCE, or wait a bit.

What's baseline? Is that 200809L?

Those POSIX-next functions shouldn't be exposed under 200809L anyway,
but under 202XXXL (whatever is decided at release), should they?