From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 28885 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2022 14:01:55 -0000 Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 8 Mar 2022 14:01:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 18278 invoked by uid 550); 8 Mar 2022 14:01:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 18241 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2022 14:01:52 -0000 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:01:40 -0500 From: Rich Felker To: Adhemerval Zanella Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com, John Scott Message-ID: <20220308140139.GO7074@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <6e5eb7bdc09780012020ae068fbf0ffd9ab023d1.camel@posteo.net> <20220308130249.GM7074@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <8a56a45e-7477-9a46-f220-f69e37f89e53@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8a56a45e-7477-9a46-f220-f69e37f89e53@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [musl] Missing _CS_POSIX_V7_THREADS_CFLAGS and Missing _CS_POSIX_V7_THREADS_LDFLAGS On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:52:48AM -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > > > On 08/03/2022 10:02, Rich Felker wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 06:50:51AM +0000, John Scott wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Please CC me on replies. > >> > >> It seems like musl is missing these confstr parameters which are > >> necessary to portably get the build flags for building multithreaded > >> programs. > > > > Yes, we were waiting to add them to pick common numbers that glibc > > would also use. Any idea if they've done that yet? If not I'll ping > > them again, and if they still don't respond I guess we just pick our > > own and let them potentially diverge... > > Do you have the initial thread on libc-alpha in hand? I think I missed it. > In any case I would like to not diverge. >From 2020: Subject: [RFC][PATCH] * bits/confname.h: Define _CS_POSIX_V7_THREADS_CFLAGS, _CS_POSIX_V7_THREADS_LDFLAGS Message-Id: <20201026233303.16034-1-ericonr@disroot.org> I thought there was a bugzilla item for it too but I can't find it. Rich