Rich, on Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:55:54 -0400 you (Rich Felker ) wrote: > In general, offering non-portable functionality that applications > can't already generally expect to have on popular systems, with no way > to probe for availability, does not seem useful, and it's even less > useful when there's a trivial portable way to do the same thing. Unfortunately, for the the bit-precise types there isn't. The supported types may be wider than `long long` (128 and even 256 will be common values that will probably widely supported) and then the task of printing them gets as nasty as for today's `__int128`. My hope was really to get all of these done for once, such that our users may use their creativity to do more useful stuff. Jā‚‘ā‚™ā‚› -- :: INRIA Nancy Grand Est ::: Camus ::::::: ICube/ICPS ::: :: :::::::::::::::::::::: gsm France : +33 651400183 :: :: ::::::::::::::: gsm international : +49 15737185122 :: :: http://icube-icps.unistra.fr/index.php/Jens_Gustedt ::