From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 2162 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2022 17:19:21 -0000
Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 10 Nov 2022 17:19:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 30104 invoked by uid 550); 10 Nov 2022 17:19:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 30069 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2022 17:19:17 -0000
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:18:58 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: enh <enh@google.com>
Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com
Message-ID: <20221110171858.GJ29905@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
References: <CAJgzZop1a9bGP6fZgZo4XS9Cb4HnmY=an==G=_u5y+ZxQ0SRcw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJgzZop1a9bGP6fZgZo4XS9Cb4HnmY=an==G=_u5y+ZxQ0SRcw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [musl] SA_RESTORER for rv64?

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 07:44:23AM -0800, enh wrote:
> arch/riscv64/bits/signal.h has contained a definition for SA_RESTORER since
> the initial commit, but i think that's just copy & paste from whichever
> architecture the rv64 headers were based on? the linux kernel itself
> doesn't have SA_RESTORER for rv64, unless i'm missing something?

I suspect this is just a mistake. Have you seen any ill effects from
it? If riscv folks can confirm it's wrong, I'll remove it.

Rich