From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 21394 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2023 08:17:17 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 9 Jan 2023 08:17:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 5766 invoked by uid 550); 9 Jan 2023 08:17:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 5731 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2023 08:17:14 -0000 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 03:17:02 -0500 From: Rich Felker To: musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <20230109081701.GD4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: [musl] Copyright years While everyone is doing the "update the copyright year range" ritual, I noticed we're a few years behind on this, but also that there seems to be a new consensus that years are not needed in copyright notices. If there are no strong objections I'd like to just go ahead and remove the years from ours rather than bumping it.