From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 4241 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2023 15:44:51 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 3 Apr 2023 15:44:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 25900 invoked by uid 550); 3 Apr 2023 15:44:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 25868 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2023 15:44:48 -0000 Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 17:44:35 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy To: Rich Felker Cc: =?utf-8?B?546L5rSq5Lqu?= , musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <20230403154435.GH3630668@port70.net> Mail-Followup-To: Rich Felker , =?utf-8?B?546L5rSq5Lqu?= , musl@lists.openwall.com References: <20230129170407.GL4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <7c77f6d5-7f42-f3a9-af81-99a251780d19@loongson.cn> <20230216231336.GW4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <2775a5e6-1fc0-e542-47ea-e90170053654@loongson.cn> <00d245b2-c0b5-9978-7f7b-9d5aa5df6137@loongson.cn> <20230403133523.GG3630668@port70.net> <20230403144248.GE4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20230403144248.GE4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Subject: Re: [musl] add loongarch64 port v6. * Rich Felker [2023-04-03 10:42:49 -0400]: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 03:35:23PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > * =E7=8E=8B=E6=B4=AA=E4=BA=AE [2023-03-17 1= 6:41:26 +0800]: > > > Hi, Rich > > >=20 > > > Do I need to do any other work with this patch v6=EF=BC=9F > >=20 > > where is v6? > >=20 > > i only see v5 patch on the list >=20 > The v6 was just sent as a link to git repo, I think. And indeed now I > need to make sure I can find the copy I grabbed to look at last time, > or else look over it again to ensure this is still correct and still > what I reviewed. This is why patches should always be sent as > attachments (thus immutable) not links. >=20 > I'm trying to wrap up the release now and expect I will apply this > (with the minor formatting fixes I promised I could make myself at > merge time) right after release. i was asking because of this glibc patch: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-April/146897.html i dont understand that change (loongarch is in glibc since 2.36 release).