From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 5230 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2023 23:34:50 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 4 Apr 2023 23:34:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 13895 invoked by uid 550); 4 Apr 2023 23:34:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 13862 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2023 23:34:46 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 19:34:34 -0400 From: Rich Felker To: enh Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <20230404233434.GF4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [musl] __riscv_flush_icache() in On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 03:49:05PM -0700, enh wrote: > i'm still trying to decide whether it makes sense to > add __riscv_flush_icache() to bionic or not[1] and was looking to see > whether musl had added it. i notice you've _implemented_ it but not added > it to the header. was that deliberate or just an > oversight? > > _____ > 1. see https://github.com/google/android-riscv64/issues/4 for my ramblings > on that topic. It's rather annoying that they added a new arch-specific header for this rather than using the existing ... We probably need to do something to clean this up but I'm not sure what the right action is. I figured it was usable with no header, but apparently it needs some flags ..? Rich