From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 22007 invoked from network); 3 May 2023 14:27:05 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 3 May 2023 14:27:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 27950 invoked by uid 550); 3 May 2023 14:27:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 27915 invoked from network); 3 May 2023 14:27:02 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=L6Imrx268TdLqbXo1qh5YcJInlSDvBlycygvtS0KaDs=; b=lTG69N6gKh+rSi6n3YgM7DunD30NdoL3u9HgyH2x6lY1gqDt+GUa3kB+ iDiS+r9j1NRosb4+mM3Ut4hmlfJaICEkuhstG7FG3r+TPck+qOM4rsbxm GUhkjzF0iVa9exEw6+AnF72BlLSCFxqcqdy/f0ux6vPvb7N/3J2vwcI25 E=; Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=jens.gustedt@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,247,1677538800"; d="scan'208";a="106069082" Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 16:26:49 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SuKCkeKCmeKCmw==?= Gustedt To: Rich Felker Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <20230503162649.19e2e95b@inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <20230503140620.GV4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20230501205037.29e42745@inria.fr> <20230501194121.GS4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20230502085740.23ff20d5@inria.fr> <20230502155903.30bee099@inria.fr> <20230502232009.GT4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20230503091340.4627057a@inria.fr> <20230503140620.GV4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Organization: inria.fr X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAACRQTFRFERslNjAsLTE9Ok9wUk9TaUs8iWhSrYZkj42Rz6aD3sGZ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/cASE0j16dKC6Gz1Rm5x343B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Subject: Re: [musl] patches for C23 --Sig_/cASE0j16dKC6Gz1Rm5x343B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rich, on Wed, 3 May 2023 10:06:20 -0400 you (Rich Felker ) wrote: > I'd rather just fix it in one place (the implementation-internal > header) so we don't have to worry about it. I still don't understand which header that is supposed to be. J=E2=82=91=E2=82=99=E2=82=9B --=20 :: ICube :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: deputy director :: :: Universit=C3=A9 de Strasbourg :::::::::::::::::::::: ICPS :: :: INRIA Nancy Grand Est :::::::::::::::::::::::: Camus :: :: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: =E2=98=8E +33 368854536 :: :: https://icube-icps.unistra.fr/index.php/Jens_Gustedt :: --Sig_/cASE0j16dKC6Gz1Rm5x343B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSN9stI2OFN1pLljN0P0+hp2tU34gUCZFJvKQAKCRAP0+hp2tU3 4nLaAJ9H/GXQiRWHUV2LD/bGymsp4YGsUQCcCwCCbfWuVk+sfo/vPTx2RxtWXAI= =1Tgw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/cASE0j16dKC6Gz1Rm5x343B--