Rich, on Fri, 26 May 2023 17:03:58 -0400 you (Rich Felker ) wrote: > I think you need an extra state that's "plain but not bare" that > duplicates only the integer transitions out of it, like the l, ll, > etc. prefix states do. Hm, the problem is that for the other prefixes the table entries then encode the concrete type that is to be expected. We could not do this here because the type depends on the requested width. So we would then need to "repair" that type after the loop. A `switch` to do that would look substantially similar to what is there, now. Do you think that would be better? Thanks Jₑₙₛ -- :: ICube :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: deputy director :: :: Université de Strasbourg :::::::::::::::::::::: ICPS :: :: INRIA Nancy Grand Est :::::::::::::::::::::::: Camus :: :: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ☎ +33 368854536 :: :: https://icube-icps.unistra.fr/index.php/Jens_Gustedt ::