From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 7994 invoked from network); 31 May 2023 14:13:56 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 31 May 2023 14:13:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 7569 invoked by uid 550); 31 May 2023 14:13:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 7534 invoked from network); 31 May 2023 14:13:52 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zhasha.com; s=wirbelwind; t=1685542419; bh=j31xxCawo5cr61qHKGoLnz/smuRJo/v9afqpAv1knuI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=CYLi6Fz4bfgbwnhDYR6XMmj1m1wR0iz89sLwo+MNyfQYpBOGwBO0txLfseOJ2J269 vihDgr3QQ1x7+AXonSXD89WqS+Yy9h+faJNeD+r5sP/34WmKkJBtnoMvxH9a/BwwtF wnXpdzzgb23EQ8yDgec9NJec8l7EPiS91TAApBVk= Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 16:13:38 +0200 From: Joakim Sindholt To: musl@lists.openwall.com Message-Id: <20230531161338.f2de8144b3211cadd6afa283@zhasha.com> In-Reply-To: <20230531155337.18812af9@inria.fr> References: <20230531145852.d6859c99a2ce15774ec657ad@zhasha.com> <20230531155337.18812af9@inria.fr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [musl] [C23 divers headers 09/17] C23: update stdbool.h On Wed, 31 May 2023 15:53:37 +0200, Jā‚‘ā‚™ā‚› Gustedt wrote: > Joakim, > > on Wed, 31 May 2023 14:58:52 +0200 you (Joakim Sindholt > ) wrote: > > > Implementations may also provide macros in addition to > > > the keywords, so we do that because some user code may rely on > > > these. > > Is this not explanation enough? > > Implementations may also provide macros in addition to the keywords, > so we do that because some user code may rely on these. I guess I just don't see the point. This is allowed for literally every symbol in libc.