From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 22436 invoked from network); 31 May 2023 21:00:31 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 31 May 2023 21:00:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 13508 invoked by uid 550); 31 May 2023 21:00:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 13470 invoked from network); 31 May 2023 21:00:26 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=gasyYt5QNXEZmp2Cmp27c6mViZ8mvOCuhQv3RbpLzDI=; b=L87Mkt5LO1Cexs8qxv35bwFhHDSaaYnfS+opdDe1snfHuO44eLJKM5i5 yoUs/yxv+3UCr0wRDO+L/B19UFYdczK3FeWvTxe9mMbjUdAwq7Bj9ey88 21mA/DJdZT6g9KVult43Vz7/Xi5+t69EMhhbpxfM03c2wzeo/KShCagAu I=; Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=jens.gustedt@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,207,1681164000"; d="scan'208";a="110584146" Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 23:00:12 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SuKCkeKCmeKCmw==?= Gustedt To: Rich Felker Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <20230531230012.06369e12@inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <20230531195928.GJ4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20230531195928.GJ4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Organization: inria.fr X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAACRQTFRFERslNjAsLTE9Ok9wUk9TaUs8iWhSrYZkj42Rz6aD3sGZ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/P6M.Ntov9k3zynLxK7eCBpO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Subject: [musl] Re: High-level C23 process requests --Sig_/P6M.Ntov9k3zynLxK7eCBpO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Rich, so now your are putting the blame on me, is that it? All the patches but for the 128 bit support are mandatory for C23. I separated this in several threads, because *you* wanted this. At several times I also posted a link to a git server that has all the patches in one branch. You knew what was coming and in which threads I planed to separate things. Other than some years ago, I perceive this list as hostile and patronizing, at times not engaging in real discussions but boasting opinions that have been formed years ago and did not evolve. This is not a place where I want to be. On the other hand I have the impression that we are almost finished. I will still take into account bona fide advice how to improve patches, evidently, if there are still things to comment. Then its up to you to take what you like and to reject what you don't. It seems that you are the boss here. Thanks J=E2=82=91=E2=82=99=E2=82=9B --=20 :: ICube :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: deputy director :: :: Universit=C3=A9 de Strasbourg :::::::::::::::::::::: ICPS :: :: INRIA Nancy Grand Est :::::::::::::::::::::::: Camus :: :: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: =E2=98=8E +33 368854536 :: :: https://icube-icps.unistra.fr/index.php/Jens_Gustedt :: --Sig_/P6M.Ntov9k3zynLxK7eCBpO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSN9stI2OFN1pLljN0P0+hp2tU34gUCZHe1XAAKCRAP0+hp2tU3 4qf+AJ96Z+JRtKHTXxH42oKLK41e42E+vgCeIifHuDCJ+0YPNyioTdc3rgchrrY= =a9/R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/P6M.Ntov9k3zynLxK7eCBpO--