From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 8445 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2023 18:22:40 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 1 Jun 2023 18:22:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 5204 invoked by uid 550); 1 Jun 2023 18:22:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 5168 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2023 18:22:36 -0000 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 20:22:23 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy To: =?utf-8?B?SuKCkeKCmeKCmw==?= Gustedt Cc: Rich Felker , musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <20230601182223.GZ3630668@port70.net> Mail-Followup-To: =?utf-8?B?SuKCkeKCmeKCmw==?= Gustedt , Rich Felker , musl@lists.openwall.com References: <20230531195928.GJ4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20230531230012.06369e12@inria.fr> <20230531213922.GK4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20230601085842.2abf2921@inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20230601085842.2abf2921@inria.fr> Subject: Re: [musl] Re: High-level C23 process requests * J=E2=82=91=E2=82=99=E2=82=9B Gustedt [2023-06-01 = 08:58:42 +0200]: > Also, in the compiler community there does not seem to be much of a > resistance to implement C23. clang and gcc are almost complete and > probably will have all of C23 the day it will be officially > published. They will then probably switch to C23 as a default one or > two versions later, once the C library support is stable. well clang had _BitInt before it was in the standard.. which is a bit of a problem because ppl only now realize that its abi is not what they want so various targets try to retroactively specify the ps abi for it which may leave existing clang broken. in any case i think standard conformance is a good thing in musl, but we are not in a big hurry to implement c23, and can wait until clang and gcc converge on abi for a couple of targets.