From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 7982 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2023 08:07:21 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Jun 2023 08:07:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 26289 invoked by uid 550); 2 Jun 2023 08:07:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 26254 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2023 08:07:18 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=LRdvL4EU4eeudafta/5pTu9a24n3u7bakzH3V+tVSCI=; b=Vh+ewr/vbZ2/FYpxRKoFQqXkE3ha7NtCOBJ7QPm9WmfKKrSwUodXkgjv OGYVVWmQbCf6sCM5kXNwgNYUE6dsjoPXLofxjZsXkIyZO2R/350h+NKsy paF/Xj1e0/XiBWDbZHnKEb5Y3QFBrsY9Nj9fm4lBaq1NxxFesKvSIc7dP E=; Authentication-Results: mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=jens.gustedt@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,212,1681164000"; d="scan'208";a="57659290" Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 10:07:05 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SuKCkeKCmeKCmw==?= Gustedt To: Rich Felker Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com, Alexander Monakov Message-ID: <20230602100705.44010dcb@inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <20230601190803.GL4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <1fe28ea2525f112264a1a819d8ce50a97504ab8b.1684932892.git.Jens.Gustedt@inria.fr> <20230524212835.GC4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20230525111653.4b0175d3@inria.fr> <917e05a1-26b9-5e13-006f-85518348c9e9@ispras.ru> <20230601190803.GL4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Organization: inria.fr X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAACRQTFRFERslNjAsLTE9Ok9wUk9TaUs8iWhSrYZkj42Rz6aD3sGZ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/sq1d9GrqSleW.HTRMJ1XQYO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Subject: Re: [musl] [C23 new stdlib 2/4] C23: add the memalignment function --Sig_/sq1d9GrqSleW.HTRMJ1XQYO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rich, on Thu, 1 Jun 2023 15:08:04 -0400 you (Rich Felker ) wrote: > Wow, I don't know why I didn't realize this being that p&-p is a > common pattern I use... Somehow I didn't see that it was the same > operation. Don't worry this seems to be quite common. As currently proposed this header tries to interface all the different extensions that are out there. By doing so, it seems that none of WG14 had noticed that there is a duplicate pair of functions that have different names but do exactly the same thing. J=E2=82=91=E2=82=99=E2=82=9B --=20 :: ICube :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: deputy director :: :: Universit=C3=A9 de Strasbourg :::::::::::::::::::::: ICPS :: :: INRIA Nancy Grand Est :::::::::::::::::::::::: Camus :: :: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: =E2=98=8E +33 368854536 :: :: https://icube-icps.unistra.fr/index.php/Jens_Gustedt :: --Sig_/sq1d9GrqSleW.HTRMJ1XQYO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSN9stI2OFN1pLljN0P0+hp2tU34gUCZHmjKQAKCRAP0+hp2tU3 4mC+AJ9uwS4Ck8VYPkU2uynFqmNSmpvjBgCeK89n8uKEdsGgWpwEUN5bDwmkKIc= =Uv63 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/sq1d9GrqSleW.HTRMJ1XQYO--