From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 10760 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2023 10:02:34 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 6 Jun 2023 10:02:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 28555 invoked by uid 550); 6 Jun 2023 10:02:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 28521 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2023 10:02:29 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=50D03wPCogeGf73vx/zVCMM8zirl2EcXoEAxZWeCLlY=; b=ICVJhPkj5zdtie+HvZZmvAzHKhiqV4/K+Zqv/pI4jofjte8GnLeRLYIP ZAx/UsrCDMn7FrcyTseAq8DBHQ2s8t8iRNWIWSYay7qe/ejrOiymj8A7r z58JS93AgM8Z3VyVBaDa//YIarXIvgRBtVk4OcMFjiJ/W18ny95SsCth9 Q=; Authentication-Results: mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=jens.gustedt@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,219,1681164000"; d="scan'208";a="57973186" Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 12:02:15 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SuKCkeKCmeKCmw==?= Gustedt To: musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <20230606120215.49359f5c@inria.fr> Organization: inria.fr X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAACRQTFRFERslNjAsLTE9Ok9wUk9TaUs8iWhSrYZkj42Rz6aD3sGZ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/Pb_W.cUFtL+OWZxQOyB0pak"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Subject: [musl] printf("%lc", L'\0') --Sig_/Pb_W.cUFtL+OWZxQOyB0pak Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, the Austin Group has a bug at https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=3D1647 that lead to a (quite late) ballot comment for C23. It seems that musl is the only implementation here that plays by the book and has no byte of output at all for this call printf("%lc", L'\0'); All others seem to be more consistent with the other "c" output formats and print one NUL byte. Are there any feelings if we are going to change this in the sense as AG proposes? Thanks J=E2=82=91=E2=82=99=E2=82=9B --=20 :: ICube :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: deputy director :: :: Universit=C3=A9 de Strasbourg :::::::::::::::::::::: ICPS :: :: INRIA Nancy Grand Est :::::::::::::::::::::::: Camus :: :: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: =E2=98=8E +33 368854536 :: :: https://icube-icps.unistra.fr/index.php/Jens_Gustedt :: --Sig_/Pb_W.cUFtL+OWZxQOyB0pak Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSN9stI2OFN1pLljN0P0+hp2tU34gUCZH8EKAAKCRAP0+hp2tU3 4gqyAKCaZz4EG2DbAKcrmu79aKdTuCz1qgCfW9TuZFJkKS5rifyHCGJ0EoYWqZM= =Ibzd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Pb_W.cUFtL+OWZxQOyB0pak--