From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 21738 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2023 14:07:26 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 6 Jun 2023 14:07:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 25855 invoked by uid 550); 6 Jun 2023 14:07:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 25808 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2023 14:07:22 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=XC7KdMOD7S4tMdT9mbNZ9v3SqZVFk9I20iHzLMa0e4M=; b=iIg8o7pBIDUmaLM3aHWe9VWAyw1Ui/wvihhF94qOMRRYp8qf6phHt84c bzg+kgOJEQ1dobGNU8yUL5A2DwR8UQ5MmfCDTnRL6W+BAVy5RDCTva/6H T27YkA2Kk/H9BFEtcdiQRjk1BPYuc7xLBhvVQJ4ogCZmLsJJJMNB84HQp 4=; Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=jens.gustedt@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,221,1681164000"; d="scan'208";a="111519514" Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 16:07:08 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SuKCkeKCmeKCmw==?= Gustedt To: Rich Felker Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <20230606160708.3aab4a26@inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <20230606124322.GW4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20230606120215.49359f5c@inria.fr> <20230606124322.GW4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Organization: inria.fr X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAACRQTFRFERslNjAsLTE9Ok9wUk9TaUs8iWhSrYZkj42Rz6aD3sGZ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/H+7MdxeHBrwFwWNbD3VbQIR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Subject: Re: [musl] printf("%lc", L'\0') --Sig_/H+7MdxeHBrwFwWNbD3VbQIR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rich, on Tue, 6 Jun 2023 08:43:22 -0400 you (Rich Felker ) wrote: > Is it really confirmed that all historical C implementations, not just > all historical POSIX ones, differ from the specification in this way? I personnally don't know much more than I posted in my question. AG tells us that musl is the only one they know about we are only aware of one (musl) that obeys a strict reading of the C standard. I don't know about historic implementations evidently. > That seems rather surprising It seems they prefer internal consistency over such a boundery case specification. > (and amusing that nobody else bothered to read the spec when > implementing). ;-) > It would be nice to make sure they're informed and in agreement on > this, if there are any others. That will be one of the difficulties with a request that comes in so late in the procedure. We will have not much data to base our decision, but for the projects where the WG14 members are implicated in one way or another. Thanks J=E2=82=91=E2=82=99=E2=82=9B --=20 :: ICube :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: deputy director :: :: Universit=C3=A9 de Strasbourg :::::::::::::::::::::: ICPS :: :: INRIA Nancy Grand Est :::::::::::::::::::::::: Camus :: :: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: =E2=98=8E +33 368854536 :: :: https://icube-icps.unistra.fr/index.php/Jens_Gustedt :: --Sig_/H+7MdxeHBrwFwWNbD3VbQIR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSN9stI2OFN1pLljN0P0+hp2tU34gUCZH89jAAKCRAP0+hp2tU3 4rtQAJ41XUduNRYNsQJ+IET0C0qMUWi49gCfcOUYsffFYS1aMImsbgIyQJDUhCo= =BMMj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/H+7MdxeHBrwFwWNbD3VbQIR--