From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from second.openwall.net (second.openwall.net [193.110.157.125]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA82F205E1 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 19:42:34 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 31801 invoked by uid 550); 12 Feb 2024 18:39:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 31763 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2024 18:39:34 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 13:42:36 -0500 From: Rich Felker To: William Roberts Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <20240212184236.GZ4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [musl] PAC/BTI Support on aarch64 On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 10:38:50AM -0600, William Roberts wrote: > Hello, > > I was just wondering if there was any work being done to support PAC > and BTI in aarch64? I could add support but didn't want to duplicate > the work. I'm not aware of any active work on this, but before writing a full implementation, it would be really helpful to start with a basic proposal for the scope of changes needed to make it work to assess whether these are managable and acceptable cost. Rich