Re: [musl] [PATCH 1/3 libc-test] functional:time:clock_nanosleep test

[Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>]

* Gardner, Ryan P <ryan.p.gardner@boeing.com> [2024-11-07 04:39:59 +0000]:
> Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> writes:
> 
> > thanks
> > patches look good. but it will take a week or two
> > for me to be able to test and apply them.
> 
> Thank you for the quick response. We appreciate your timeline for testing and applying the patches.
> 
> Our plan is to submit tests for the majority of functions that currently lack coverage within libc-test. 
> We already have a significant number of tests written and ready for submission. To avoid overwhelming
> you with patches, do you have a preferred cadence for the submission of these tests?
> 

over the next month im only in front of a computer sporadically

but code style or quality of tests are less strict than for libc,
so i dont expect many iterations. just post the patches so when i
can take a look i can comment or apply them.

btw if there is a repo with a branch i can cherrypick from that
is a bit easier for me than handling mails. then i think you
dont even have to post "obvious" patches to the list. i can pick
them from the branch.

> Additionally, we are planning to setup runtime tests in collaboration with the Buildroot community. This
> would facilitate testing across various embedded configurations and processor architectures. Once up 
> and running, when we submit new test patches we can reference a fork of Buildroot that shows the tests 
> passing on various hardware configurations.

nice.

the infra in libc-test is not amazing for continous tests.
when i get to it i will try to improve it.

> 
> Looking forward to your guidance,
> Ryan Gardner