Re: [musl] [PATCH 1/3 libc-test] functional:time:clock_nanosleep test

[Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>]

* Gardner, Ryan P <ryan.p.gardner@boeing.com> [2024-11-07 04:39:59 +0000]:

> Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> writes:
> 
> > thanks
> > patches look good. but it will take a week or two
> > for me to be able to test and apply them.
> 
> Thank you for the quick response. We appreciate your timeline for testing and applying the patches.

applied the patches and added you to authors
(which is not very formal, more for acknowledgement)

thanks.

> 
> Our plan is to submit tests for the majority of functions that currently lack coverage within libc-test. 
> We already have a significant number of tests written and ready for submission. To avoid overwhelming
> you with patches, do you have a preferred cadence for the submission of these tests?
> 
> Additionally, we are planning to setup runtime tests in collaboration with the Buildroot community. This
> would facilitate testing across various embedded configurations and processor architectures. Once up 
> and running, when we submit new test patches we can reference a fork of Buildroot that shows the tests 
> passing on various hardware configurations.
> 
> Looking forward to your guidance,
> Ryan Gardner