From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 7139 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2022 06:20:09 -0000
Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Apr 2022 06:20:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 7967 invoked by uid 550); 2 Apr 2022 06:20:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 7932 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2022 06:19:59 -0000
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
References: <64c0ef49-4618-8eca-c826-bd2a840c284b@loongson.cn>
 <CAK8P3a1d=jHPn0CdNYROWffoyxBhj3cmXJpO_Sb10T39zFS+wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <34029768-603c-79a1-03c7-a02132a108ba@loongson.cn>
 <CAK8P3a3zz6WXTMNnzbcpJ_khM3X+U-Puxa6osaD9LeV3gaKLoA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?546L5rSq5Lqu?= <wanghongliang@loongson.cn>
Message-ID: <262e237c-7876-75ff-a6d5-bbc9cc6611b9@loongson.cn>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 14:19:44 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux mips64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3zz6WXTMNnzbcpJ_khM3X+U-Puxa6osaD9LeV3gaKLoA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-CM-TRANSID:AQAAf9Bx8M4A60dik6IVAA--.46921S3
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoWruFy5KryUCFyDtrWkCw1UGFg_yoWfXrb_uF
	Z3Wrs2kw1UAF4rKrZ7XFn2vFW7ZFWUGFy0gas2grWxAry7tF15XFn0g3Zxurn0qw4rJrn8
	X398GrnakrnrJjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT
	9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbxkYjsxI4VWxJwAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I
	6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM2
	8CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW5JVW7JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0
	cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWxJVW8Jr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVWxJr0_GcWl84ACjcxK6I
	8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI
	64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8Jw
	Am72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IY64vIr41lc7I2V7IY0VAS07AlzVAYIcxG8wCY
	02Avz4vE-syl42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4
	xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1j6r15
	MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I
	0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrZr1j6s0DMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v2
	6r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_GrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU8
	6OJ5UUUUU==
X-CM-SenderInfo: pzdqwxxrqjzxhdqjqz5rrqw2lrqou0/
Subject: Re: [musl] Re: add loongarch64 port

Hi, Arnd

I found it has not been removed from system call list in kernel yet.
I wonder if I could keep consistent with the current status of the kernel
for the time being,and modify as the kernel changes.


Hongliang Wang


在 2022/4/1 下午3:48, Arnd Bergmann 写道:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 9:40 AM 王洪亮 <wanghongliang@loongson.cn> wrote:
>> 在 2022/3/31 下午4:14, Arnd Bergmann 写道:
>>
>> In kernel port, loongarch64 use the generic struct stat.
>>
>> loongarch64 define struct stat and kstat in musl is consistent with
>>
>> generic stat in kernel.
> My point was that I asked for these to be removed in
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK8P3a2kroHVN3fTabuFVMz08SXytz-SC8X11BxxszsUCksJ4g@mail.gmail.com/
>
> With __NR_newfstatat and __NR_fstat gone from the system
> call list, there is no 'struct stat' that is exposed by the kernel.
>
>         Arnd