From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2512
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: idunham@lavabit.com
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: STLport
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 18:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <27737.50.0.224.127.1356922708.squirrel@lavabit.com>
References: <16264585.15369.1356916055281.JavaMail.root@grantgray.id.au>
    <9635407.15373.1356916278520.JavaMail.root@grantgray.id.au>
    <20121231020607.GJ20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356922722 5304 80.91.229.3 (31 Dec 2012 02:58:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:58:42 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-2513-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Dec 31 03:58:58 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-2513-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-2513-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1TpVaa-0007O0-2g
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 03:58:56 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 17864 invoked by uid 550); 31 Dec 2012 02:58:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 17853 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2012 02:58:40 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com;
  b=kFEn/PgdwkhHd/nEvGa+BY2V3d+VyaS+2mSQvadc6WV5FgtZ3qz9nWAPqSGWCqfevsjgX0M0vMeGaV+1hPF1i43I9gH9E0pcFs5rKmjMaIHMRDmYJ7GwZSDKPxeEbE6vYLrZBxzWLK48zOPFh3Z/AtSYWjlzlrPBOr1lySaAimc=;
  h=Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
In-Reply-To: <20121231020607.GJ20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2512
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2512>

> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:11:18PM +1100, Grant Gray wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>>
>> Is anyone working on getting STLport working with musl?
>>
>>
>> I had a quick look at the STLport sources and it seems to assume
>> glibc is in use if the toolchain is GCC, so it seems some porting
>> effort is required to get it working with musl.
>
> Is there a reason you want to use STLport rather than libstdc++ or
> libc++? My impression was that STLport was outdated, unmaintained, and
> full of ugly legacy hackery from the 90s...

The last tarball is from 2008.  So yes, I'd call it unmaintained.  Even
DJGPP's GCC is more current than that.