Re: musl + libc++

[Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@gmail.com>]

On Mar 22, 2016, at 7:48 PM, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> On 22/03/16 04:43, Lei Zhang wrote:
>> 2016-03-22 7:39 GMT+08:00 Hayden Livingston <halivingston@gmail.com>:
>> 
>>> Have folks gotten around using musl + libc++ (from the llvm project)?
>>> 
>>> I'm trying to get a setup where all my dependencies can be moved to
>>> musl and libc++ to build static executables.
>>> 
>> 
>> I've tried to do about the same thing before and failed because libc++
>> depends on some functions not implemented in musl yet, like strtoll_l()
>> and __printf_chk() IIRC.
> 
> Nothing should directly use __printf_chk() how did you get that symbol
> there?.

Well, I manually linked a toy C++ program with musl and libc++, and when I ran the program the dynamic linker complained about not finding a bunch of symbols, including strtoll_l, __printf_chk, etc. Perhaps I mistakenly messed musl with glibc somehow...


Lei