From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/11185 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Pedro Alves Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general,gmane.comp.gdb.patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix invalid sigprocmask call Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:37:21 +0000 Message-ID: <306c1ba1-db66-f55f-3ab7-3b3eefd4564c@redhat.com> References: <1490324519-11228-1-git-send-email-yszhou4tech@gmail.com> <2b0bab84-e36e-e109-5444-dc84369dddce@redhat.com> <39f28782-65e8-0f52-3c8f-134a6f05788b@redhat.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490362658 21505 195.159.176.226 (24 Mar 2017 13:37:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:37:38 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, musl@lists.openwall.com, Rich Felker To: Yousong Zhou Original-X-From: musl-return-11200-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Mar 24 14:37:34 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1crPPI-0004vU-3G for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:37:32 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 31864 invoked by uid 550); 24 Mar 2017 13:37:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 31846 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2017 13:37:36 -0000 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+MlrLo4hTOE9AX1DN2xwDpJFMGhHmHoex0ojYkMg2ZA=; b=r6tz6IevPWtZbCCngO9dyg0mzfwcMdYf1bFG8gALISm7XfjEv7ipZZ5BpZ0nyIoVst 3paaxVkbGNelsApfntbNjNSNKx0h3hwD2xSUqxs+L1zMrC5jUhXb2BPU1P5Mfp4mDpDj zptPKDVgveaWtFKV3ow1HeyvdAYTzKSzv07HG4qTJHf97Bv0So34xDEHPFddJhtEhqqV X0i6YZbvClV5fawnA2ZgIfexhun4sphVT7RRR1KnZSIxZd3gEo/9d+OSqEqvIeZ1CpYn vnibKAWeYiRTmcSMiLs+7WahoVbSwgrqVyDvsqwBLtDw6B781QjgU6YXbztao3TDjWZB jnIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3UWOoxVJn0zAu/m0ZgKXmxeZDETriWBkV1NZFTUhLbUTxU8f+f2hTpnrXO877eoiqd X-Received: by 10.28.207.14 with SMTP id f14mr3056080wmg.72.1490362644861; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 06:37:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:11185 gmane.comp.gdb.patches:122751 Archived-At: On 03/24/2017 01:05 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote: > On 24 March 2017 at 20:55, Pedro Alves wrote: >> The standard wasn't built on a vacuum. It starts by ratifying common >> implementation behavior. If no historical implementation behaves like what >> you're suggesting, what's the point of enforcing that, when it's clearly >> NOT the intent? You're just causing porting pain for no good reason. >> Please file a bug against the standard to have the error section clarified instead. > > Lol, now I will consider the idea of bumping the door of POSIX committee ;) No need. Go here: http://austingroupbugs.net/ > I am cc-ing musl-libc list now. Original thread here: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00426.html Thanks, Pedro Alves