From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/862 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Pennington Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Hi and a few questions Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 15:44:24 -0500 Message-ID: <3093865.QEH9na1OAA@main.pennware.com> References: <1753849.ANqesc5nEP@main.pennware.com> <20120520175316.GC17860@port70.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337546737 29098 80.91.229.3 (20 May 2012 20:45:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 20:45:37 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-863-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun May 20 22:45:35 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SWD0M-0000xw-6r for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 20 May 2012 22:45:30 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 24377 invoked by uid 550); 20 May 2012 20:45:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 24369 invoked from network); 20 May 2012 20:45:29 -0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=D8PF24tj c=1 sm=0 a=/l7PkcR/UKDnn7Q2wmGJww==:17 a=hdNgKtvFP3AA:10 a=fR_ARpL9IlcA:10 a=msTO8fkKGJEA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=N4Ps669bAAAA:8 a=6mqbD-twU54JuHbt4zEA:9 a=6nShJMIBePW7PIopK-sA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=/l7PkcR/UKDnn7Q2wmGJww==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 65.26.59.215 User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.3.2-6.fc16.x86_64; KDE/4.8.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20120520175316.GC17860@port70.net> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:862 Archived-At: On Sunday, May 20, 2012 07:53:16 PM Szabolcs Nagy wrote: [snip] > "conformance/interfaces/pthread_key_create/1-2.c:44: error: control reaches > end of non-void function" there are a couple of similar bad tests This one might be real. I think the declaration of void pthread_exit(void *); should be void pthread_exit(void *) __attribute__ ((__noreturn__)); for gcc and clang. Does musl allow this type of attribute usage? I don't see many attributes used in the header files. -Rich