From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 15204 invoked from network); 31 May 2023 17:09:44 -0000
Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 31 May 2023 17:09:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 24410 invoked by uid 550); 31 May 2023 17:09:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 24372 invoked from network); 31 May 2023 17:09:40 -0000
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.ispras.ru 1DE3844C1000
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 20:09:29 +0300 (MSK)
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
In-Reply-To: <47E67930-DACE-4475-86F2-022A0EAA5F30@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <45274206-ca94-2c12-c8e9-7e5d5991fa20@ispras.ru>
References: <cover.1685536608.git.Jens.Gustedt@inria.fr> <1c8e850ed3190af39b9e3f501d79899d438e7292.1685536608.git.Jens.Gustedt@inria.fr> <20230531142743.GB4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20230531163643.2a382b4a@inria.fr> <20230531144128.GD4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <20230531165545.29eb823f@inria.fr> <20230531145724.GF4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20230531170700.65bd9c11@inria.fr> <20230531151406.GG4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20230531173718.3d7d499f@inria.fr> <20230531154043.GH4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <20230531175628.168043d2@inria.fr> <84a7a59e-afe9-2b63-7039-25f9638cfb0b@ispras.ru> <47E67930-DACE-4475-86F2-022A0EAA5F30@inria.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [musl] [C23 128 bit 4/4] C23: implement proper support for
 int128_t and uint128_t


On Wed, 31 May 2023, Jens Gustedt wrote:

> > It is
> > not supported on 32-bit platforms neither by GCC nor by LLVM. On 64-bit
> > platforms it is piggy-backing on double-word operations support required
> > for implementing 64-bit 'long long' on 32-bit platforms.
> 
> So what? On the arch where it exist, it is used and useful. (And I also think
> that implementations improved over the state from 20 years ago that you
> describe.)

Sorry, I'm not sure what you meant in the parenthetical statement. Improved
in what sense?

Alexander