From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/149
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?B?THVrYSBNYXLEjWV0acSH?= <paxcoder@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: cluts review
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:25:07 +0200
Message-ID: <4E1DD4F3.5090206@gmail.com>
References: <20110713110723.GA22153@openwall.com> <4E1D8964.3020502@gmail.com> <20110713160327.GA24660@openwall.com> <4E1DCDE5.1040008@gmail.com> <20110713170551.GA25095@openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310578012 22921 80.91.229.12 (13 Jul 2011 17:26:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:26:52 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-233-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Jul 13 19:26:48 2011
Return-path: <musl-return-233-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-233-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1Qh3Cy-0006OP-7w
	for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:26:48 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 11365 invoked by uid 550); 13 Jul 2011 17:26:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 11356 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2011 17:26:47 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Ho3cdG7YmXhxG0PgYjwNnWMJ4SK9I7gwk8TW2QBY6l0=;
        b=jvESdeN063Vx18ckT4UpsNDWNCLFow12EaQLP5dmn25MT7u+7/SXtw4HT75jppuW0w
         o8pW1XAiDGOoucj9nBUdFjj5T/jalFR3D9wz3h/plxP2QaFJBE3Q5S5m6icKMgZYck9D
         zvGW24z9DkhbvXIw3Pb8qmjmfhR0XEaQkF+1c=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110626 Icedove/3.1.11
In-Reply-To: <20110713170551.GA25095@openwall.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:149
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/149>

On 07/13/2011 07:05 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
[...]
Maybe my Thunderbird is impotent, but this list gets swamped pretty 
fast. Anyway, so I need SA_NODEFER because the handler doesn't return, 
understood. As for the sigsetjmp and stuff, that's what we had before. 
And yet again, I forgot why it was deprecated (I think there was signal 
structs being different across platforms, though I'm not sure where the 
problem was), but anyway Rich suggested sigaction.
This reminds me, the code is distinctly C99, and it tests SUSv4 
functions, so if you don't mind, for cluts, I'll use those two standards 
and go back to SA_NODEFER. If I decide to pay more attention to that 
distributed computer project of yours in the future (I thought there 
would be some smart CS people applying for that one), then the situation 
will probably be different ;-)
Oh, and I do believe I know aht "clobbered" means (overwriting the new 
value of the variable with the old one, from when the context was saved, 
right?). That's what I've said I've checked with buf.c. I'll check it 
for other relevant collections now too... Will push new minor fixes in a 
few minutes.
Luka.

P.S. Perhaps I should start thinking about how the final cluts.c will 
look like, otherwise it might become hard to change all the test 
collections later...