From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/239
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?B?THVrYSBNYXLEjWV0acSH?= <paxcoder@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: New daily reports
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:51:30 +0200
Message-ID: <4E3A79B2.8090204@gmail.com>
References: <4E39C84F.8060705@gmail.com> <20110803224651.GB11437@openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312455219 4477 80.91.229.12 (4 Aug 2011 10:53:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 10:53:39 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-323-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Aug 04 12:53:35 2011
Return-path: <musl-return-323-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-323-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1QovYV-0003eb-5j
	for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:53:35 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 9891 invoked by uid 550); 4 Aug 2011 10:53:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 9883 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2011 10:53:34 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=CSAGUpc3DRvFJN56P/7e08cW63sdWVl3nH9UBCOuvnI=;
        b=HIq8/1xZ4VqOk4DBb/LEHLXvvG4uSRXoiLr/JHkcx5QgoIP15ww9cGF6exkp23Kns1
         gack0+XZ2FFmWVhNfSGoA2z3QJ0m9tFkkclaamYt7wTXleM5t3oAzrY4inBjtzrbP3NT
         gKu2+M1TGar2ZlfpUITEqhCwmGzKmUpceGmc8=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110626 Icedove/3.1.11
In-Reply-To: <20110803224651.GB11437@openwall.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:239
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/239>

On 08/04/2011 12:46 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 12:14:39AM +0200, Luka Mar??eti?? wrote:
>> The report will look better next time, this time I
>>      * finished the template for the generator
>> Tomorrow I should:
>>      *finish the generator itself, generate the first test collection
>> (task nr. 7, was it?)
> Since the generator approach and details may change a lot based on
> Rich's feedback, wouldn't it be better to temporarily switch to a task
> not requiring the generator?  Are there any pending tests that you'd
> choose to implement straight in C anyway?
>
> Alexander
I could temporarily focus on "9. Signals" if we don't settle the 
generator issue.
Luka.