From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/242
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?B?THVrYSBNYXLEjWV0acSH?= <paxcoder@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: New daily reports
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:01:09 +0200
Message-ID: <4E3A8A05.4070407@gmail.com>
References: <4E39C84F.8060705@gmail.com> <20110803224651.GB11437@openwall.com> <4E3A79B2.8090204@gmail.com> <20110804115443.GA23430@openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312459409 29857 80.91.229.12 (4 Aug 2011 12:03:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 12:03:29 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-326-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Aug 04 14:03:26 2011
Return-path: <musl-return-326-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-326-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1Qowe5-0004ft-6w
	for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:03:25 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 15747 invoked by uid 550); 4 Aug 2011 12:03:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 15682 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2011 12:03:11 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=xpZCQKVlbXklmxRpaIzwoxCDnNPNBrFtXQkBSrMqLp0=;
        b=CHrcB3VTpLGReJG1RvUOEI7Jf0cPdFFzQkyKlu2yrU0TazvdgwVpElds2a4D07TMh2
         tulO7S/8EeXAoXb9myWwBK0t/EoqrtwRPTkH0N38eCqrLZwrQcGG+SBa5ZOeLNOFqCba
         QDq1u9TowLpeFuaBhIFfMVA32WHH8cbxeMO2Y=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110626 Icedove/3.1.11
In-Reply-To: <20110804115443.GA23430@openwall.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:242
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/242>

On 08/04/2011 01:54 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> I am tempted to propose something not on the original list, such as
> testing of ctype macros and locales, or looking for functions that make
> variable size allocations on the stack (may be tricked into overwriting
> another thread's stack or the heap), but I realize that you have more
> than enough tasks already.

Wouldn't (parts of) those be tasks 0 and 7 respectively (coincidentally, 
the two tasks that were next on my to-do list after the generator)?

Luka