From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/379 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?THVrYSBNYXLEjWV0acSH?= Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: New daily reports - nothing Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:23:06 +0200 Message-ID: <4E426A1A.3000601@gmail.com> References: <4E39C84F.8060705@gmail.com> <20110803224651.GB11437@openwall.com> <4E3A79B2.8090204@gmail.com> <4E3B331E.7050502@gmail.com> <4E3CC5AC.3070404@gmail.com> <4E3DFB5D.8040008@gmail.com> <20110807073224.GG132@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <4E3F10C7.4060601@gmail.com> <4E40A33F.7090804@gmail.com> <4E41E020.7020109@gmail.com> <20110810020218.GA27745@openwall.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312975532 17831 80.91.229.12 (10 Aug 2011 11:25:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:25:32 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-380-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Aug 10 13:25:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qr6ud-0005OX-LP for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:25:27 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 13713 invoked by uid 550); 10 Aug 2011 11:25:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 13705 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2011 11:25:26 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=psPrd8Ynuo6ytN2/C2EaSjCBw2bOQzhuod+7AZEWR7k=; b=SD52Q28BX9yxqDtGbLAc5F63NfTNeCTix42FpfQBOT28+1uY46dKia00++kd2SECqS pA3synXPBmnABoU5+WKLzHfzYK5ya4ZbL+K+mfnjei+djW+3OJHCmVx2doU+MtAwf40X 5QjVDUIVhMFST88U2MoMg3imrRqMlBx/dtdi8= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110626 Icedove/3.1.11 In-Reply-To: <20110810020218.GA27745@openwall.com> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:379 Archived-At: On 08/10/2011 04:02 AM, Solar Designer wrote: > P.S. Your use of "Re:" on ever-changing Subjects remains completely > ridiculous. As explained before, this has nothing to do with threading, > but it breaks the convention of "Re:" being followed by the previous > message's Subject (that you're replying to). For your use, it's best > not to include "Re:". My bad, I should stay within the same thread though (regardless of loosing the "Re:" and changing the subject), right? Thanks